| dc.contributor.author | YAYA, RIZAL | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-14T13:16:31Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-08-14T13:16:31Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-04 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Yaya, R. (2017), “Twelve years of Scottish Schools PPP – are they better value for money?” Journal of Public Procurement, Vol. 17, No 2,pp. 187-228 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2150-6930 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/12868 | |
| dc.description | This research evaluates the value-for-money (VFM) obtained from
public-private partnership (PPP) schools in Scotland, based on headteachers
questionnaires, local authority interviews and Scottish School Estate
Statistics. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This research evaluates the value-for-money (VFM) obtained from
public-private partnership (PPP) schools in Scotland, based on headteachers
questionnaires, local authority interviews and Scottish School Estate
Statistics. The period covered is 2000-2012, when 395 new schools were
commissioned. The PPPs were better in building condition and maintenance
standards and conventionally-financed schools were better in terms of
teacher access and improvement in staff morale. There was transfer of
knowledge whereby the high standards of the PPPs then became the new
standards for the conventionally-financed schools. Concerns about PPP VFM
relates to the high cost of unitary charges and contract inflexibilities. A
higher percentage of headteachers of conventionally-financed schools
(63.64%) considered their new schools resulted in good VFM compared to
PPP schools (42.86%). | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | PrAcademics Press | en_US |
| dc.subject | Public Private Partnerships | en_US |
| dc.subject | Value for Money | en_US |
| dc.subject | School Estate | en_US |
| dc.subject | Scotland | en_US |
| dc.title | TWELVE YEARS OF SCOTTISH SCHOOL P UBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS : ARE THEY BETTER VALUE FOR MONEY | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
