Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTJAHJONO, HERU KURNIANTO
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-17T04:01:55Z
dc.date.available2016-09-17T04:01:55Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/2143
dc.description.abstractThis experimental study aims to examine the impact of distributive and procedural justice towards affective commitment in every context or situation that is configurational. The meta-analysis, concluded by Hartman, Yale, and Galle (1999), explained that researches on fairness in general was conducted in the context of unfairness. This particular study examined various situations to form a configuration of distributive justice, procedural justice, and subjective perspective of social capital as moderating variable. This study involved 268 subjects in one class relation to performance appraisal’s policy. The findings show that both distributive and procedural justice are vital predictors. Similarly, the configuration of these variables play a role in explaining affective commitment. Another important finding is that social capital, as a subjective perspective, plays a significant role in explaining affective commitment.en_US
dc.publisherCenter of Administrative Studiesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 21;No.3
dc.subjectaffective commitmenten_US
dc.subjectdistributive fairnessen_US
dc.subjectprocedural fairnessen_US
dc.subjectsocial capitalen_US
dc.titleTHE FAIRNESS OF ORGANIZATION'S PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SOCIAL CAPITAL AND THE IMPACT TOWARD AFFECTIVE COMMITMENTen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • JURNAL
    Berisi tulisan dosen dalam yang telah dimuat dalam jurnal nasional maupun internasional yang tidak diterbitkan oleh UMY. Diharapkan menambahkan link dari jurnal yang asli dalam diskripsinya.maupun internasional

Show simple item record