| dc.contributor.advisor | SOFIANI, ERMA | |
| dc.contributor.author | INDAH SARI, EMILISA | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-08T04:23:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-10-08T04:23:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-09-07 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/21857 | |
| dc.description | Restorasi akhir merupakan faktor yang berpengaruh dalam keberhasilan
perawatan saluran akar. Restorasi akhir yang tidak adekuat dapat menyebabkan
penetrasi bakteri dan saliva ke dalam saluran akar, sehingga menyebabkan
kegagalan perawatan. Penempatan orifice barrier di bawah restorasi akhir dapat
mengurangi kontaminasi saliva dan bakteri ke dalam saluran akar. Penelitian ini
bertujuan untuk mengetahui adanya perbedaan kebocoran mikro antara Smart
Dentin Replacement, Semen Ionomer Kaca dan Flowable Resin Komposit sebagai
orifice barrier pada gigi pasca perawatan saluran akar.
Desain penelitian ini adalah eksperimental laboratoris. Sampel penelitian
adalah 27 gigi premolar 1 atau 2 mandibula permanen yang telah dicabut dan dibagi
menjadi 3 kelompok yaitu kelompok Smart Dentin Replacement, semen ionomer
kaca dan flowable resin komposit. Gigi di preparasi dengan metode crown down
dan di obturasi menggunakan gutta percha dan AH Plus. Setelah penempatan orifice
barrier dengan ketebalan 4 mm, gigi direndam dalam larutan metilen biru 2% pada
suhu 37ºC selama 24 jam. Gigi dibelah dari arah bucco-lingual dan pengamatan
kebocoran mikro menggunakan stereomikroskop perbesaran 10x.
Hasil uji One-Way ANOVA menunjukkan nilai p =0,000 (p <0,05) yang
berarti terdapat perbedaan kebocoran mikro antara Smart Dentin Replacement,
Semen Ionomer Kaca dan Flowable Resin Komposit. Hasil uji Post Hoc Tukey
menunjukkan semen ionomer kaca berbeda secara signifikan (p <0,05)
dibandingkan dengan Smart Dentin Replacement dan flowable resin komposit.
Smart Dentin Replacement memiliki nilai kebocoran mikro yang paling kecil yaitu
sebesar 1,70, akan tetapi tidak berbeda secara signifikan dengan flowable resin
komposit. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The final restoration is an important factor in successful root canal
treatment. Inadequate final restoration leads to bacterial and salivary penetration
in the root canal, causing a treatment failure. Placement of the orifice barrier under
the final restoration could reduce saliva and bacterial contamination in the root
canal. This study aimed to determine the differences in microleakage between
Smart Dentin Replacement, Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Resin Composite
as orifice barrier in root canal treated teeth.
The design of this study was laboratory experimental. The sample was 27
premolars teeth with 1 or 2 mandibular permanent teeth that had been extracted
and divided into 3 groups: Smart Dentin Replacement, Glass Ionomer Cement and
Flowable Resin Composite. Teeth were prepared by crown-down method and
obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus. After placement of the orifice barrier
with the thickness of 4 mm, the teeth were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution
at 37ºC for 24 hours. Teeth sectioned in buccolingual direction and observation of
microleakage using stereomicroscope at 10x magnification.
One-Way ANOVA results showed p = 0,000 (p <0.05) which means there
were microleakage differences between Smart Dentin Replacement, Glass Ionomer
Cement and Flowable Resin Composite. Tukey Post Hoc results showed
significantly different glass ionomer cement (p <0.05) compared to Smart Dentin
Replacement and flowable resin composite. Smart Dentin Replacement has the
smallest microleakage value of 1.70, but does not differ significantly with flowable
composite resin. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN DAN ILMU KESEHATAN UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA | en_US |
| dc.subject | microleakage, orifice barrier, Smart Dentin Replacement, Glass Ionomer Cement, flowable resin composite | en_US |
| dc.title | PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN MIKRO SMART DENTIN REPLACEMENT, SEMEN IONOMER KACA DAN FLOWABLE RESIN KOMPOSIT SEBAGAI ORIFICE BARRIER PADA GIGI PASCA PERAWATAN SALURAN AKAR | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis
SKR
FKIK
272 | en_US |
