| dc.contributor.advisor | MUHAMMAD, ALI | |
| dc.contributor.author | MOHAMMAD, FADEL | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-24T01:55:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-10-24T01:55:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/22524 | |
| dc.description | The process of Turkey’s accession into full membership in
European Union has gone through an endlessly problematic
matter. Both parties have strong distinction in history, identity,
and attitude which hamper the process to be finalized. In the
eye of constructivism, the concept of ‘Itself’ and ‘the Other’ is
utilized to explain the phenomenon on this prolonging
accession case regarding Turkey and European Union. On one
hand, Turkey see itself as the most secular and democratic
country among any other Muslim countries in the world and
while seeing European Union as ‘Christian community,
Turkey is interested to join in by the means of that Turkey can
be a role model of developed country who still cherish their
national identity and cultures also religious norms and values
in it. On the other hand, the Europeans see Turkey
incompatible to the identity of most European countries.
Turkey is considered to be still under the scrutiny of
conservative Muslims who oppose the idea of getting into EU.
Turkish democracy and human rights are also considered to be
in slow pace following many repressive orders by its political
elites over the years. EU also see themselves, which
represented by European countries, as a Union who strive for
the freedom of individual and the government free from
particular dogmas which sometimes grip a country in
becoming developed. Turkey is mainly seen to be ‘too
different’ from other European countries and if Turkey is ever
to be accepted in the EU, ergo it will threaten and endanger the
fundamental identity of European Union. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The process of Turkey’s accession into full membership in
European Union has gone through an endlessly problematic
matter. Both parties have strong distinction in history, identity,
and attitude which hamper the process to be finalized. In the
eye of constructivism, the concept of ‘Itself’ and ‘the Other’ is
utilized to explain the phenomenon on this prolonging
accession case regarding Turkey and European Union. On one
hand, Turkey see itself as the most secular and democratic
country among any other Muslim countries in the world and
while seeing European Union as ‘Christian community,
Turkey is interested to join in by the means of that Turkey can
be a role model of developed country who still cherish their
national identity and cultures also religious norms and values
in it. On the other hand, the Europeans see Turkey
incompatible to the identity of most European countries.
Turkey is considered to be still under the scrutiny of
conservative Muslims who oppose the idea of getting into EU.
Turkish democracy and human rights are also considered to be
in slow pace following many repressive orders by its political
elites over the years. EU also see themselves, which
represented by European countries, as a Union who strive for
the freedom of individual and the government free from
particular dogmas which sometimes grip a country in
becoming developed. Turkey is mainly seen to be ‘too
different’ from other European countries and if Turkey is ever
to be accepted in the EU, ergo it will threaten and endanger the
fundamental identity of European Union. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA | en_US |
| dc.subject | Turkey, European Union, Constructivism, Enlargement policy, History, Identity, and Attitude. | en_US |
| dc.title | THE DISTINCT PERSPECTIVES ON TURKEY ACCESSION TO EUROPEAN UNION: A CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis
SKR
FISIP
394 | en_US |
