Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWIDOWATY, YENI
dc.contributor.authorFITRIYANTI, FADIA
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-22T04:25:37Z
dc.date.available2016-09-22T04:25:37Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-13
dc.identifier.issn2407-9189
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/2529
dc.descriptionOne of the advantages of settlement through arbitration in comparison to court, the parties are free to determine which procedural law to be applied. In addition, in Indonesia there are national arbitration also a Sharia arbitration.The objective in this research is the first to examine the dispute settlement procedures of business through BANI and Basyarnas, both reviewing and analyzing comparison BANI business dispute settlement procedure and Basyarnas, third formulate a draft dispute settlement procedure based arbitration to the principles of justice and the Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution.The method used is a normative juridical research and supported juridical empiris.Based on the resultsof this research concludedthat theprocedure ofthe settlement of business disputesin BANI and Basyarnas needs to be studied, analyzed andcompared with each other, as it also analyzed using legislation regarding arbitration, international conventionsand institutions ofinternational arbitrationtoseekthe concept ofdispute resolution procedureswhichis based onjusticeand thePancasilaandthe 1945 Constitution.From the conceptis expected tobe taken into consideration, literaturematerialsonthe partiesin the context ofa businessdispute settlement procedure in BANI and Basyarnas.en_US
dc.description.abstractOne of the advantages of settlement through arbitration in comparison to court, the parties are free to determine which procedural law to be applied. In addition, in Indonesia there are national arbitration also a Sharia arbitration.The objective in this research is the first to examine the dispute settlement procedures of business through BANI and Basyarnas, both reviewing and analyzing comparison BANI business dispute settlement procedure and Basyarnas, third formulate a draft dispute settlement procedure based arbitration to the principles of justice and the Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution.The method used is a normative juridical research and supported juridical empiris.Based on the resultsof this research concludedthat theprocedure ofthe settlement of business disputesin BANI and Basyarnas needs to be studied, analyzed andcompared with each other, as it also analyzed using legislation regarding arbitration, international conventionsand institutions ofinternational arbitrationtoseekthe concept ofdispute resolution procedureswhichis based onjusticeand thePancasilaandthe 1945 Constitution.From the conceptis expected tobe taken into consideration, literaturematerialsonthe partiesin the context ofa businessdispute settlement procedure in BANI and Basyarnas.en_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.publisherUNIVERSITY RESEARCH COLLOQUIUMen_US
dc.subjectBANIen_US
dc.subjectBASYARNASen_US
dc.subjectTHE COMPARATION OF BUSINESS DISPUTE SETTLEMENTen_US
dc.titleHARMONISASI PROSEDUR PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BISNIS PADA BANI DAN BASYARNASen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • SEMINAR
    Berisi materi dosen (bukan sertifikat) yang dipresentasikan dalam seminar lokal, nasional maupun internasional diluar UMY, baik sebagai perserta Call for Paper, presenter, narasumber maupun keynote speaker.

Show simple item record