| dc.contributor.author | TJAHJONO, HERU KURNIANTO | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-27T06:30:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-09-27T06:30:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/3016 | |
| dc.description.abstract | There are several perspectives to explain the relationship between strategic human
resources management practices and organizational performance. This article discusses the
controversy within each perspective, which is universalistic and contingency perspectives. This article tries to replicate some of Delerey and Doty’s research on modes of theorizing in
strategic human resource management. Strategic human resource management practices are identified into seven practices and are used to develop argumentation from that individual perspective. Organizational performance is measured by financial performance. The results show that argumentations from those two perspectives can explain the variation levels within financial performance. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | JURNAL KINERJA | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | VOL. 9;N0.2 | |
| dc.subject | strategic HRM | en_US |
| dc.subject | universalistic | en_US |
| dc.subject | contingency | en_US |
| dc.subject | organizational performance | en_US |
| dc.title | PRAKTIK-PRAKTIK MANAJEMEN SDM STRATEGIK: PENGUJIAN EMPIRIS UNIVERSALISTIK DAN KONTINJENSI DALAM MENJELASKAN KINERJA ORGANISASIONAL | en_US |
| dc.type | Other | en_US |
