dc.contributor.advisor | JAMALUDINN, SYAKIR | |
dc.contributor.author | SYAHIDA, MUHAMMAD AGUNG | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-29T02:36:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-29T02:36:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-01-02 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/31359 | |
dc.description | This research aims at finding out, analyzing, and comparing the strength and weakness between house sale and purchase with Sharia Bank financing and that of with Sharia Property Developer. It is descriptive qualitative research in nature. The data collection technique was carried out with observation, interview, and documentation. The checking of data credibility and validity used source triangulation. The result of the research shows that house sale and purchase in Sharia Bank use murabahah principle, while Sharia Property Developer use ishtisna’ principle. The strength of sharia bank is using the principles of conscientiousness, flat installment, and not giving penalty. In addition, the existence of sharia supervisory board makes the consumers have safety and legality guarantee on the activities of sharia bank transaction. Meanwhile, the weaknesses are that the provisions in murabahah principle have not been well implemented yet and the administration process and requirements are difficult and taking a long time. Then, the strengths of Sharia Property Developer are the use of ishtisna’ principle and the administration tends to be easy and has shorter process. However, the weaknesses are that the provisions of ishtisna’ principle have not been well implemented yet and there have not been any institutions that supervise the transaction and the activities of sharia property developer that cause the lack of transaction safety guarantee for customers, in order to anticipate fraud by Sharia Property Developer. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This research aims at finding out, analyzing, and comparing the strength and weakness between house sale and purchase with Sharia Bank financing and that of with Sharia Property Developer. It is descriptive qualitative research in nature. The data collection technique was carried out with observation, interview, and documentation. The checking of data credibility and validity used source triangulation. The result of the research shows that house sale and purchase in Sharia Bank use murabahah principle, while Sharia Property Developer use ishtisna’ principle. The strength of sharia bank is using the principles of conscientiousness, flat installment, and not giving penalty. In addition, the existence of sharia supervisory board makes the consumers have safety and legality guarantee on the activities of sharia bank transaction. Meanwhile, the weaknesses are that the provisions in murabahah principle have not been well implemented yet and the administration process and requirements are difficult and taking a long time. Then, the strengths of Sharia Property Developer are the use of ishtisna’ principle and the administration tends to be easy and has shorter process. However, the weaknesses are that the provisions of ishtisna’ principle have not been well implemented yet and there have not been any institutions that supervise the transaction and the activities of sharia property developer that cause the lack of transaction safety guarantee for customers, in order to anticipate fraud by Sharia Property Developer. | en_US |
dc.publisher | FAKULTAS AGAMA ISLAM UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA | en_US |
dc.subject | Sale and Purchase, House, Sharia Bank, Sharia Property Developer | en_US |
dc.title | ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN JUAL BELI RUMAH PADA BANK SYARIAH DENGAN JUAL BELI RUMAH PADA DEVELOPER PROPERTI SYARIAH TANPA MELALUI BANK | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis SKR FAI 416 | en_US |