The emergence of bribery cases involving Judges in Indonesia, for example the major Judges in Indonesia, namely former Chief Judge Akil Mochtar and constitutional judge Patrialis Akbar and many others, shows that there is a decline in the integrity of judges in Indonesia and many raise questions against the selection system for Judges in Indonesia. This study intends to evaluate the judicial recruitment system in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research with statutory, legal approach. The results of this study indicate that the system of recruitment of judges in Indonesia still has several problems. The first problem is the issue of requirements related to how to assess integrity, morality, statesmanship, and the devotion of candidates to God. The second is the problem of the judicial selection mechanism in Indonesia. The mechanism for selecting judges in Indonesia is not transparent and accountable, and the reformulation of the judicial recruitment system in Indonesia to be even better is needed. This study proposes several recommendations. First, it relates to tracking the integrity of candidates, therefore an assessment tool is needed to affirm the integrity and morality of prospective judges in the judicial selection mechanism in Indonesia. Second, the selection mechanism must be transparent and open to the public; and third, the importance of clear legal reform in the Judicial Authority Act.