View Item 
      •   UMY Repository
      • 03. DISSERTATIONS AND THESIS
      • Students
      • Undergraduate Thesis
      • Faculty of Law
      • Department of Law
      • View Item
      •   UMY Repository
      • 03. DISSERTATIONS AND THESIS
      • Students
      • Undergraduate Thesis
      • Faculty of Law
      • Department of Law
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      CASE STUDY OF BUSINESS COMPETITION SUPERVISORY COMMISSION DECISION NO. 22/KPPU-I/2016 ABOUT EXCLUSIVE DEALING AND MARKET CONTROL BY PT. TIRTA INVESTAMA

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      COVER (187.4Kb)
      ABSTRAK (175.6Kb)
      HALAMAN PENGESAHAN (451.6Kb)
      HALAMAN JUDUL (538.4Kb)
      BAB I (303.7Kb)
      BAB II (368.7Kb)
      BAB III (182.6Kb)
      BAB IV (740.9Kb)
      BAB V (178.1Kb)
      DAFTAR PUSTAKA (349.0Kb)
      NASKAH PUBLIKASI (712.6Kb)
      LAMPIRAN (352.0Kb)
      Date
      2018
      Author
      RIZAL, EMHA AINUN
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      Business competition in the business world is already a natural thing for business people. But, there are deviant businesses who are dishonest, hinder other businesses, etc. Therefore, the Government has enacted Law No. 5 of 1999 on Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition to prevent and minimize unfair competition in businesses. The author conducts research on cases of unfair business competition at PT. Tirta Investama. This case began with the case of PT. Tirta Fresindo Jaya against PT. Tirta Investama. Indeed, KPPU has done an investigation this case. Based on KPPU's decision No. 22/KPPU-I/2016 PT. Tirta Investama and PT. Balina Agung Perkasa committed a violation of an exclusive dealing as stipulated in article 15 paragraph 3 letter b and market control contained in article 19 letter a and b of Law No. 5 of 1999 on Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Competition and imposed a sanctions of Rp 20.13 billion. In this case study, the author also conducted a research on the mechanism for handling business competition cases by KPPU against PT. Tirta Investama. This research is a normative legal research/ library research and uses qualitative descriptive data analysis. This approach uses a case approach. In this case using two approaches, namely per se illegal and rule of reason. The law, this law is based on how the law must be applied, and KPPU has been appropriate in handling this case based on various considerations, legal facts and applicable provisions.
      URI
      http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/23134
      Collections
      • Department of Law

      DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
      Contact Us | Send Feedback
      Theme by 
      @mire NV
       

       

      Browse

      All of UMY RepositoryCollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

      My Account

      Login

      DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
      Contact Us | Send Feedback
      Theme by 
      @mire NV