View Item 
      •   UMY Repository
      • 03. DISSERTATIONS AND THESIS
      • Students
      • Undergraduate Thesis
      • Faculty of Agriculture
      • Department of Agribusiness
      • View Item
      •   UMY Repository
      • 03. DISSERTATIONS AND THESIS
      • Students
      • Undergraduate Thesis
      • Faculty of Agriculture
      • Department of Agribusiness
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      DINAMIKA KELOMPOK TANI HUTAN RAKYAT SIDODADI II DI KECAMATAN PAJANGAN KABUPATEN BANTUL

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      COVER (100.0Kb)
      HALAMAN JUDUL (576.8Kb)
      HALAMAN PENGESAHAN (247.5Kb)
      ABSTRAK (262.4Kb)
      BAB I (203.5Kb)
      BAB II (391.7Kb)
      BAB III (214.7Kb)
      BAB IV (202.4Kb)
      BAB V (557.1Kb)
      DAFTAR PUSTAKA (187.5Kb)
      LAMPIRAN (93.55Kb)
      NASKAH PUBLIKASI (574.9Kb)
      Date
      2019-07-25
      Author
      SARI, PUTRI KARTIKA
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      This study has aims to describe the dynamics of community that occur in Sidodadi 2 farmers’ group of community forest in Pajangan District, Bantul Regency. The indicators used in this study include objective function, task function, group development, group atmosphere and group cohesiveness. The resource person used in this study was determined by the key informant method, namely group members who understood the situation of the group in depth. This study used descriptive qualitative method that the results of the study are obtained by conducting interviews and observations. The results showed that group dynamics that occurred in Sidodadi 2 farmers’ group of community forest in the objective function, task function, and group development were not dynamic, while for group atmosphere and group cohesiveness showed that the results of dynamic group were dynamics. Internal factors that influence group dynamics that occur were group experience, non-formal education and motivation. Non-formal education was a dominant internal factor in influencing dynamics. External factors that influence the dynamics of tools and seedlings, counseling, training and mentoring were heated, for training was the dominant external factor in influencing the formation of group dynamics.
      URI
      http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/28389
      Collections
      • Department of Agribusiness

      DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
      Contact Us | Send Feedback
      Theme by 
      @mire NV
       

       

      Browse

      All of UMY RepositoryCollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

      My Account

      Login

      DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
      Contact Us | Send Feedback
      Theme by 
      @mire NV