dc.contributor.advisor | WARSITO, TULUS | |
dc.contributor.author | OKTAVIA, DINI | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-30T02:09:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-12-30T02:09:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-12-20 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/7720 | |
dc.description | Japan’s New Security Bills became a controversial policy during the reign of Prime
Minister Shinzo Abe. Abe administration claims that Japan's new security bills have
positive goals both for inside and outside the country. Nevertheless, the South
Korean government responded negatively the implementation of Japan's new
security bills. This study will explain why the South Korean government responded
negatively towards Japan's new security bills, using the concept of national interest
and theory of foreign policy decision-making in order to obtain better understanding
about the specific reason that prompted the policy. The preliminary results of the
research show that the South Korean government responded negatively toward
Japan's new security bills because they overshadowed deep trauma of the past
Japanese imperialism, in addition to the South Korean government regards the
implementation of Japan's new security bills will have implications on bilateral
relations, that the condition is quite susceptible. South Korean domestic political
conditions, economic conditions and military capabilities to territorial disputes
between Japan and South Korea became the most significant reason why South
Korea responded negatively Japan's New Security Bills. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Japan’s New Security Bills became a controversial policy during the reign of Prime
Minister Shinzo Abe. Abe administration claims that Japan's new security bills have
positive goals both for inside and outside the country. Nevertheless, the South
Korean government responded negatively the implementation of Japan's new
security bills. This study will explain why the South Korean government responded
negatively towards Japan's new security bills, using the concept of national interest
and theory of foreign policy decision-making in order to obtain better understanding
about the specific reason that prompted the policy. The preliminary results of the
research show that the South Korean government responded negatively toward
Japan's new security bills because they overshadowed deep trauma of the past
Japanese imperialism, in addition to the South Korean government regards the
implementation of Japan's new security bills will have implications on bilateral
relations, that the condition is quite susceptible. South Korean domestic political
conditions, economic conditions and military capabilities to territorial disputes
between Japan and South Korea became the most significant reason why South
Korea responded negatively Japan's New Security Bills. | en_US |
dc.publisher | FISIP UMY | en_US |
dc.subject | Japan’s New Security Bills, Japan, South Korea, Security | en_US |
dc.title | RESPON KOREA SELATAN TERHADAP JAPAN’S NEW SECURITY BILLS (South Korean’s Response Toward Japan’s New Security Bills) | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis
SKR
567 | en_US |