| dc.contributor.author | YU, SU-JIN | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-14T03:37:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-07-14T03:37:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-01-21 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 979-1707-99-5 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/11570 | |
| dc.description | Now a day, Our society has a various political actors.
It means that citizen get the spread of participation and improve legitimacy in the government policy-making process. But along with this, Actors who have a different aim can raise more conflict between actors and delay the policy decision. Therefore, Analyzing conflict aspect between actors can realize mature democracy and provide implication to the social- consensus in the policy-making process.
In this research, Dealing with the case study about the Gyeyang Mt golf course development plan (GGDP) which has shown sharp conflict aspect. I want to know “why didnt reach any agreement between actors in the GGDP case?’, ‘How will the actors conflict aspect from different belief system be affect to the Government policy-making process?’ and ‘What kind of conditions need to make social consensus in the GGDP case?’.
Commonly, environmental conflicts in the policy-making have two different belief systems such as environmental conservation and environmental development. Base on this two different belief system, various stakeholders united as a policy actor. Coalition actors from two different values enforce a different strategy to policy-making.
Analyzing this case, I try to deduct some political implication about conflict management. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Now a day, Our society has a various political actors.
It means that citizen get the spread of participation and improve legitimacy in the government policy-making process. But along with this, Actors who have a different aim can raise more conflict between actors and delay the policy decision. Therefore, Analyzing conflict aspect between actors can realize mature democracy and provide implication to the social- consensus in the policy-making process.
In this research, Dealing with the case study about the Gyeyang Mt golf course development plan (GGDP) which has shown sharp conflict aspect. I want to know “why didnt reach any agreement between actors in the GGDP case?’, ‘How will the actors conflict aspect from different belief system be affect to the Government policy-making process?’ and ‘What kind of conditions need to make social consensus in the GGDP case?’.
Commonly, environmental conflicts in the policy-making have two different belief systems such as environmental conservation and environmental development. Base on this two different belief system, various stakeholders united as a policy actor. Coalition actors from two different values enforce a different strategy to policy-making.
Analyzing this case, I try to deduct some political implication about conflict management. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS AND ADMINISTRATION FACULTY OF SOCIAL AND POLITICAL SCIENCE UMY | en_US |
| dc.subject | Environmental conflict, Conflict management | en_US |
| dc.title | CONFLICTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY-MAKING IN KOREA: THE CASE OF GYEYANG MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE | en_US |
| dc.type | Book | en_US |
