Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor
dc.contributor.authorPRATAMA, DHANY PUTRA
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-24T06:57:33Z
dc.date.available2018-08-24T06:57:33Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-14
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/20783
dc.description.abstractA series of military tension growing in Korean Peninsula between the Republic of Korea, State of Japan, and Democratic People’s Republic of Korea has attracted several major powers to get involved, and one of them being the United States of America. However, DPRK or North Korea, had developed nuclear and missile technology, causing massive fear towards states nearby. Attempts to disarm the North had been conducted several times, such as Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO) and Six-Party Talks, but all of them seems to fail to fulfill their supposed goal. With the change of regime in the US post – Six-Party Talks, the US government decided to change their course of action in facing DPRK and their nuclear and missile program. With the Foreign Policy Strategy’s Typology concept, this article argues that the US uses confrontation strategy to face North Korea’s threats through economic sanction, monitoring, and military actions.en_US
dc.publisherFISIP UMYen_US
dc.subjectUnited States of America, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Confrontation, Nuclear and Missile Programen_US
dc.titleSECURITY CONSTELLATION IN KOREAN PENINSULA: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S POLICY ON NORTH KOREA AFTER SIX – PARTY TALKS’ FAILUREen_US
dc.typeThesis SKR FISIP 049en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record