| dc.contributor.advisor | SATRIAWAN, IWAN | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | NASRULLAH, NASRULLAH | |
| dc.contributor.author | ISTYAWATI, ASTRI | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-14T02:40:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-14T02:40:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-08-27 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/23119 | |
| dc.description | The enactment of the Law Number 7 of 2017 on General Election has
created some controversies. One of those controversies is about Presidential
Threshold, whether it is still needed or not as the upcoming Presidential
Election and Legislative Election in General Election 2019 will be held
simultaneously. This research is normative legal research with statute and
comparative approaches. The result of this study shows that the Presidential
Threshold in the upcoming simultaneous election in 2019 still has some
problems. Firstly, the Presidential Threshold is not relevant if it is
implemented in general election 2019. The second problem is the dilemma
in choosing the alternative election for using Presidential Threshold. This
research proposes some recommendations. First, the DPR should revise the
Article 222 on the Presidential Threshold of the Law Number 7 of 2017 on
General Election, regarding to the upcoming election in 2019 that will be
hold simultaneous so there should be no Presidential Threshold. Second, the
DPR should choose a better model of the Presidential Election whether the
election is returned to the separate election as implemented in previous
election or it still uses the Presidential Threshold or uses new system of
simultaneous election without the Presidential Threshold. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The enactment of the Law Number 7 of 2017 on General Election has
created some controversies. One of those controversies is about Presidential
Threshold, whether it is still needed or not as the upcoming Presidential
Election and Legislative Election in General Election 2019 will be held
simultaneously. This research is normative legal research with statute and
comparative approaches. The result of this study shows that the Presidential
Threshold in the upcoming simultaneous election in 2019 still has some
problems. Firstly, the Presidential Threshold is not relevant if it is
implemented in general election 2019. The second problem is the dilemma
in choosing the alternative election for using Presidential Threshold. This
research proposes some recommendations. First, the DPR should revise the
Article 222 on the Presidential Threshold of the Law Number 7 of 2017 on
General Election, regarding to the upcoming election in 2019 that will be
hold simultaneous so there should be no Presidential Threshold. Second, the
DPR should choose a better model of the Presidential Election whether the
election is returned to the separate election as implemented in previous
election or it still uses the Presidential Threshold or uses new system of
simultaneous election without the Presidential Threshold. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | FACULTY OF LAW UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA | en_US |
| dc.subject | General Election, Simultaneous Election, Presidential Threshold. | en_US |
| dc.title | PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD IN SIMULTANEOUS ELECTION AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF THE LAW NUMBER 7 OF 2017 ON GENERAL ELECTION | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis
SKR
FH
155 | en_US |
