PERKEMBANGAN PENGATURAN HAK IMUNITAS ANGGOTA DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT REPUBLIK INDONESIA
Abstract
This research departs from two factors, namely Viktor Laiskodat case that hate speech during the declaration event of East Nusa Tenggara Regent Kupang Regent 2017, and the existence of Law Number 1 Year 2018 About Revision of Law Number 17 Year 2014 About Second Amendment Upon Law No. 17 of 2014 concerning the People's Consultative Assembly, the Regional People's Legislative Assembly which raises a polemic against the right of immunity, and examines the history of the development of immunity rights during the Volksraad era until the revision of Law No. 17 of 2014. This research aims to understand, know, and seek answers about the regulation of immunity rights for members of the House of Representatives to develop and discuss the problems contained in Law No. 1 of 2018. The method used in this research is normative law research which is expanded to improve secondary data, where the data collecting of this research mostly done in D.I.Yogyakarta and conducted interview in DKI Jakarta. The results of this study include the development of immunity rights from 1969 to 2014, there is a discussion of the problems that occur in Law No. 1 of 2018, and there is a performance report of the House of Representatives in 2017 which discussed in general both legislation, reports of attendance of each faction, and the use of legislation to the public, to the last of these studies discussing the limits and sanctions on the right of immunity to members of the House of Representatives. Up to the conclusion of the desire of the House of Representatives to make the institution proportional and better. Every member of the People's Legislative Assembly shall have a better and more arbitrary and enforce the rules.