View Item 
      •   UMY Repository
      • 03. DISSERTATIONS AND THESIS
      • Students
      • Vocational Final Project
      • Akuntansi Terapan
      • View Item
      •   UMY Repository
      • 03. DISSERTATIONS AND THESIS
      • Students
      • Vocational Final Project
      • Akuntansi Terapan
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN METODE CAMELS DAN METODE RGEC PADA PT BANK PANIN DUBAI SYARIAH TBK

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      COVER (46.45Kb)
      HALAMAN JUDUL (308.3Kb)
      HALAMAN PENGESAHAN (302.3Kb)
      ABSTRAK (34.61Kb)
      BAB I (201.4Kb)
      BAB II (152.4Kb)
      BAB III (411.3Kb)
      BAB IV (174.4Kb)
      BAB V (95.75Kb)
      DAFTAR PUSTAKA (42.48Kb)
      LAMPIRAN (3.360Mb)
      LAMPIRAN (2.506Mb)
      LAMPIRAN (1.863Mb)
      Date
      2018-12-05
      Author
      ARVIANDA, KHAIRUNISA MAYNORA
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      A research of rating The Bank Health Level on PT. Bank Panin Dubai Syariah ltd using CAMELS and RGEC methods has been conducted. The purposes of this study are to rate Panin Dubai Syariah Bank health level and to investigate whether there are result differences of bank health rate using both methods. This study was conducted based on financial reports of PT. Bank Panin Dubai Syariah ltd for 2016 and 2017 period. The result of this study when using CAMELS method are showing that in 2016 the bank was categorized as fairly sound in both financial and management factors. However, in 2017, bank was categorized as fairly sound for its financial factors and unsound for its management factors. On the other hand, when using RGEC method the bank health in 2016 are sound (NPL) and fairly sound (LDR) for risk profile aspect, good for the GCG aspect, less sound for earning aspect, and very sound for capital aspect. Meanwhile in 2017, the risk profile is categorized as unsound (NPL) and sound (LDR), the GCG is fairly good, the earning is unsound, and the capital is sound. Besides that, if both methods are investigated on its quantitative part only (calculating the ratios of each aspects), there were found not many different results.
      URI
      http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/23772
      Collections
      • Akuntansi Terapan

      DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
      Contact Us | Send Feedback
      Theme by 
      @mire NV
       

       

      Browse

      All of UMY RepositoryCollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

      My Account

      Login

      DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
      Contact Us | Send Feedback
      Theme by 
      @mire NV