Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSUBIYANTO, SUBIYANTO
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-14T07:04:33Z
dc.date.available2017-07-14T07:04:33Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-21
dc.identifier.isbn979-1707-99-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/11580
dc.descriptionSmoking habit was one of global problems, but the effec of it are very dangerous on smoking related diseases, so Indonesian Government had to take the genius actions. This study investigated the effects of Government Antismoking Campaign on Behaviour of Smoking in East Java. Research model was adopted from the Theoiy of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behaviour introduced by Ajzen and Fishbein modified byDeVriesetal. The population were smokers or someone who have experience with cigarette smoking in East Java, sampling method by Multistage Cluster Random Sampling in three stages. Data analysis utilized Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) used AMOS 4,01. Hypothesis analysis used regression Weight standardized estimates, compare p value in 5percent significance if p value < 5percent is mean significant. This study found four negative significant hypotheses and two not significant hypotheses. The effect of Government antisnioking campaign on Attitude toward smoking behaviour and on Subjective norm of smoking are not significant, while effect of Attitude toward smoking behaviour on Refusal skill, the effect of Subjective norm of smoking on Refusal skill, are negative significant. The effect of Refusal skill on Behavioural intention to smoke, and the effect of Behavioural intention to smoke on Behaviour of smoking are also negative significant.en_US
dc.description.abstractSmoking habit was one of global problems, but the effec of it are very dangerous on smoking related diseases, so Indonesian Government had to take the genius actions. This study investigated the effects of Government Antismoking Campaign on Behaviour of Smoking in East Java. Research model was adopted from the Theoiy of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behaviour introduced by Ajzen and Fishbein modified byDeVriesetal. The population were smokers or someone who have experience with cigarette smoking in East Java, sampling method by Multistage Cluster Random Sampling in three stages. Data analysis utilized Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) used AMOS 4,01. Hypothesis analysis used regression Weight standardized estimates, compare p value in 5percent significance if p value < 5percent is mean significant. This study found four negative significant hypotheses and two not significant hypotheses. The effect of Government antisnioking campaign on Attitude toward smoking behaviour and on Subjective norm of smoking are not significant, while effect of Attitude toward smoking behaviour on Refusal skill, the effect of Subjective norm of smoking on Refusal skill, are negative significant. The effect of Refusal skill on Behavioural intention to smoke, and the effect of Behavioural intention to smoke on Behaviour of smoking are also negative significant.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS AND ADMINISTRATION FACULTY OF SOCIAL AND POLITICAL SCIENCE UMYen_US
dc.subjectGovernmenten_US
dc.subjectAnti Smoking Campaignen_US
dc.titleGOVERNMENT ANTI SMOKING CAMPAIGN: QUIXOTIC DREAM OR CONFIDENT EXPECTATION?en_US
dc.typeBooken_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record